
Nine Business Benefits of Outsourcing SOC Operations
A million-dollar upfront investment, a talent shortage, and high payroll costs — or a predictable SOC service instead? Why should company leadership consider outsourcing IT security operations?
DORA is not just another compliance project but the new operational minimum of the financial sector: banks, insurers and financial service providers have to prove that they can recover and keep operating even in the event of a cyberattack or a technology failure.

DORA is not just another compliance project but the new operational minimum of the financial sector. For banks, insurers and financial service providers it is no longer enough to maintain “good IT security” — they have to prove that they can recover, operate and provide their services even in the event of a cyberattack or a technology failure. In practice this means that digital resilience is no longer a concept that exists on paper, but a daily operational requirement. And DORA compliance requires an operational discipline that many organisations can only sustain with external support.
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is the EU regulation, mandatory since 17 January 2025, that governs the digital operational resilience of the financial sector. Its aim is to create a uniform, mandatory and auditable framework for managing ICT (Information and Communication Technology) risks. This is critical because the financial sector is now built entirely on digital infrastructure, so even a single technology failure or attack can cause system-wide disruption. DORA is meant to reduce this risk.
DORA applies to every financial entity in the EU, including:
DORA therefore regulates not only financial institutions but the whole ecosystem.
In Hungary, the DORA compliance of financial institutions is supervised primarily by the Central Bank of Hungary (MNB), but the system works on several levels: national and EU supervisors (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) ensure compliance together.
Violating DORA has serious financial, operational and reputational consequences. Supervisors have been actively checking compliance since 2025, and the sanctions are not symbolic.
Non-compliance is therefore not only a legal but also a business risk.
DORA divides the compliance requirements into five major areas. Together they form the framework of digital resilience, and each of them requires continuous operation, not a one-off project.
The risks of critical systems have to be assessed and continuously evaluated, along documented and auditable processes.
Major incidents have to be classified, reported urgently and documented in a detailed final report.
Regular resilience tests, mandatory TLPT every three years and realistic attack simulations prove the effectiveness of the defences.
The financial entity is responsible for the risks of its cloud and other ICT providers too — contractual and supply-chain transparency is required.
Up-to-date threat intelligence and industry-level data sharing strengthen the common resilience of the sector.
Preparation consists of four main steps, and each of them is critical to compliance.
Gap analysis — The organisation has to assess where it stands now against the DORA requirements. This step sets the direction and the priorities of the whole project.
Establishing risk management and incident management processes — DORA expects not only documentation but working processes. Assigning roles and responsibilities is key here.
Introducing technology solutions — SIEM, SOAR, EDR, CTI — without these, real-time resilience cannot be maintained. Technology ensures fast response and auditability.
Ensuring continuous operation — DORA compliance is not a project but an operating model. 24/7 monitoring and regular testing are essential.

The operation of a SOC (Security Operations Center) maps almost perfectly onto the controls prescribed by DORA. And the SOCaaS model allows financial entities to ensure compliance as continuous operation, not as a one-off project.

DORA is the new operational foundation of the financial sector. Compliance is not optional, and it is not a one-off project — it requires continuous operational resilience. For banks and insurers the biggest challenge is not understanding the rules, but sustaining 24/7, auditable, technology-intensive operation.
A SOC can provide this operation most cost-effectively:
So the question is not whether a SOC is needed, but: an in-house SOC or SOC as a Service?